I'd say it was fairly likely that "something happened", as in them having sex.



In his lawsuit, PE makes a point of stating that when the phone woke him up, she was lying on the other bed. What is conspicuously absent is mention of her state of dress. The elephant in the room is that in her lawsuit she describes waking up naked from the waist down. I know if I were in PE's situation, and when I had woken up she was lying fully clothed on the other bed, after her saying she woke up half naked, I'd damn sure make a point of saying so in my lawsuit. This seems to strongly imply that she was indeed half naked when they woke up, whcih in turn strongly implies something happened. Doesn't prove it of course, but there's a pretty strong implication.


Other factor: Back when Pina's lawsuit was fairly fresh and current, PE released an announcement that he's taken a polygraph test and passed, and it included the questions that he'd answered and passed.



2. Do you have memories of sexual contact with Betty, without her participation and consent? No
3. Did you physically force or coerce Betty to engage in sexual contact with you? No


Those questions were not just questions the polygraph operator asked randomly as they popped into his head. You can bet your next paycheck that they were very carefully selected and worded beforehand in consultation with his attorney. This is essentially a tacit admission that he either recalls having sex with her, or strongly suspects that he might have. If he was confident and sure that they hadn't had sex at all, that would have been the question he and his attorney would have directed the polygraph operator to ask him.