Originally Posted by
Wheelswatch
Not exactly because it's PBS.
So my guess is, they will run the CA solutions first, then set aside a whatever they need from pairings that check-airmen get, then run the FO solutions, not allowing FOs to get those pairings.
So in effect the same negative impact as we now face. Basically guys on IOE will have the same seniority as our check-airman Lol.
Before PBS was in the picture, I do remember a conversation with a NC member several months ago who told me they were shooting for a percentage of dedicated check-airman lines. So for example 75% of anticipated IOE will pre build x number of extra captain lines. The rest of IOE would displace FOs and be pay protected. Course this is irrelevant now, but may show their thinking on the matter.
It could be that way, but it should not, or at least some language must protect it. ASA limited the company to withholding no more than 2% of block hours. Sure all the 2% could be the IOE guys trips, but they may need to be doing IOE on more than 2%...so at least they have a limit.
If ANYTHING went on your schedule, you were payed for it, whether you flew it or not. There was no calling in to be available if the company pulled you off. It touched you schedule, you were paid.
Originally Posted by
I like BIG Bus
Please call, text, email your reps to send this back before it goes to a pilot vote....I didn’t walk around for hours in the cold, and sacrifice in other areas for this piece of crap!!! I won’t capitulate to these bullies. Put the ball back in their court, and keep the pressure on!!! At this point “no deal” is better than this!
100% READY TO VOTE NO!!!
Already have and they have already thrown in the towel. They are afraid of the company, afraid of airplanes not coming here, afraid that they wont come back to the table. It's up to us.