View Single Post
Old 11-20-2018 | 05:59 PM
  #191  
symbian simian's Avatar
symbian simian
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 226
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
The automation forbids flying the airplane into the ground in the same way you can't stall an Airbus.

Set an altitude below the EGPWS floor for that area and it stops. No matter what you do. "I can't let you do that, Dave".

And don't say shut the engines down. Without abnormal indications the computer won't let you do that, either.

Jeez you guys are so last century thinkers.

Think about how a drone works. You turn it on, without ever operating one. It knows where it is. You tell it to go to xyz, it takes off, flies, and returns and lands all on its own.

That is where we are headed. The technology exists. It works. The only thing stopping it is regulations.

How did that work out for the radio operator, navigator, or flight engineer?

Not to mention, if you think about it, your argument for having TWO pilots is because one might fly it into the ground.

IMO, that is a reason to have ZERO pilots. In the same line of thinking, since the vast majority of accidents these days are pilot error, that is also a reason to have ZERO pilots - it will improve safety.
AF447 crashed because the pitot tubes iced over. Yes, the pilots didn't help, but we aren't even close to having a certified system that would have done better. I would think that for every crash due to pilot error there is numerous crashes prevented because of pilot input you won't hear anything about because "nothing happened". Automation certainly improves safety for things like autoland, but lets not get ahead of ourselves here, they haven't been able to automate one dimensional travel (train), how the H do you think they will be able to automate 3 dimensional travel.
Reply