View Single Post
Old 11-25-2018, 05:15 PM
  #93  
symbian simian
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
That's just for takeoff. I'm thinking 25.671(c)
.
"to be capable of continued safe flight and landing after any of the following failures or jamming in the flight control system and surfaces (including trim, lift, drag, and feel systems)"

(c)(1)

"(1) Any single failure, excluding jamming (for example, disconnection or failure of mechanical elements, or structural failure of hydraulic components, such as actuators, control spool housing, and valves)."

Also 25.671(c)(3)
"A runaway of a flight control to an adverse position and jam must be accounted for if such runaway and subsequent jamming is not extremely improbable."

Extremely improbable is defined in 25.1309. "they are not anticipated to occur during the entire operational life of all airplanes of one type".

So - airplane must be controllable if a control surface can runaway to a mechanical stop.

Boeing is in a world of hurt if the MCAS is shown to be Part 25 uncompliant.
Boeing has been in that world of hurt for a while. It is in the manual that to recover from a stall you need to apply AND trim and reduce power as the elevator doesn't have enough authority.
symbian simian is offline