Originally Posted by Bucking Bar

Don't think this is good. It would be much better if he were on our side of the table. He probably would be on our side of the table had we been able to keep our stuff together at ALPA National's BOD meeting or if we had not gotten really wild with some of our choices for Reps. There is no politically viable way for him to work for us.

Reality check, we have had 5 scope Chairmen in less than two years (assuming Brent gets replaced). We just had a negotiator resign. We lack the political stability and discipline to develop our team properly.