Originally Posted by
ToddChavez
I'm sorry, but can we discuss the incredible insensitivity of using the 767 photo in that article? It's not even a week from the crash and this Rachel b**** is displaying an incredible lack of journalistic integrity. What a joke!!!
In what way is that insensitive and lacking journalistic integrity? Where is it written that after an accident, images of aircraft of the same type or livery are forbidden to be published for some undetermined period of time?
There are still lots of 767s flying, and a bunch of them are painted that way. Using an image of one of them in a business article is in no way insensitive, disrespectful, lacking journalistic integrity, or anything else.