Originally Posted by
dawgdriver
Unreported/under-reported statistics vary depending on the source, from 2/3 to the highest I found was 92%. Arriving at an accurate figure is difficult because A) How do you quantify what isn't reported, and B) definitions of what constitutes rape, assault and sexual violence vary and are subject to interpretation. Age, religion, nationality culture, etc.
That said, if the following CDC definition constitutes "Sexual Violence', I envision the results to be very high.
Non-physically pressured unwanted sex
Unwanted sexual contact (intentional sexual touching), or
Non-contact, unwanted sexual experiences (such as verbal sexual harassment)
https://www.cdc.gov/features/sexualviolence/index.html
Given the above definition, I would challenge anyone to honestly claim they could never be accused of being "perpetrators of sexual violence" (hopefully the statue of limitations on that off-color joke I told in '83 has expired). I would also contend that a strict adherence to these guidelines would dramatically reduce the world population problem, cut down on inappropriate workplace behaviors, and cause even more women to complain about their nonexistent social life. (levity intended)
Joking aside, while it's certainly a serious matter that rightfully deserves attention and education, laughably unrealistic guidelines only serve to demean its serious nature. Our government can never be accused of wandering into paranoia. I'm old enough to remember the original (logical) EEOC definition of Sexual Harassment to be 'Unwelcome sexual advances or requests for sexual favors when such conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment or advancement. Makes sense. Since then, the government has rendered one's employment status to pretty much whatever offends someone.
"Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person’s sex. For example, it is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general".... "The victim does not have to be the person harassed but could be anyone affected by the offensive conduct".https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sexual_harassment.cfm
I am aware that political activists (particularly feminists) have long been trying to change reporting criteria. This means that data sets are inherently faulty because the standards change from year to year in some cases.
I think this documentary tells it all pretty well, including all her addendum found in interviews all over YouTube. I know that political activists went out of their way to silence this documentary, ironically made by a feminist while trying to prove their smear agenda. In the case of these two pilots, this documentary proves precisely the way that men are being persecuted in professional environments because of politics. Such activists are trying to replace and eliminate due process so that a mere accusation can be used to take out anyone who opposes them.
The Red Pill - A Cassie Jaye Documentary
