Originally Posted by
ShyGuy
Besides, requiring PIC (esp in this day n age when it’s east to obtain in terms of quick seniority) is a good thing. I know a QX guy who said some think the Q is hard to upgrade to, the EJet is easier, but their mentality is I already got my pathways job so why should I upgrade? Some don’t want to risk getting a black mark on their record. This PIC change is a good thing. It’s not 2007-2012 anymore. Go upgrade and enjoy.
Nobody is saying that PIC ISN’T a good thing. But changing the rules after the deal has been made is unethical. Arguably, it’s breach of contract. Are you really OK with that?
I understand that the original deal was different than the one you (or I) would have wanted them to make, but are you really OK with management simply voiding the previous deal when they change their minds or - alternatively - that ‘bait and switch’ had always been the going in plan?