Originally Posted by HSLD
You left a key word out of your quote, what I typed was "alleged civil or criminal misconduct". You also mistakenly feel that I'm the guy who has a problem with your posts.
When we are contacted with a complaint about a post, we make a judgement call as to the merit of the claim. If in our opinion a claim is merited, we will act as to reduce our chances of being named as a co-defendant in any potential litigation.
We reserve the right and full authority to pull any post or any user for any reason at any time. That said, I don't take any form of censorship lightly although I'm sometimes required to consider the risk that users present.
If the TOS for this forum are unacceptable to you then don't post, it really is that simple. If you do post, and happen to violate the TOS, don't be surprised if we (the owners of this forum) act to minimize our risk.
All the Best -
I do not agree with everything posted by KB; however, I do feel he has the right to know the who, what, when and where of what he is being accused of. Even in our corrupt legal system, one has the right to face his accuser. This does not have to be done in a public forum, but a phone call or private email would certainly be appropriate I would think. Someone's thin skin is no excuse for this.