View Single Post
Old 04-29-2019 | 08:02 PM
  #377  
Jackson28
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dera
Look at the 175 RSV lists. There's a ton of people who hide out. They finally caught the 10 year FO in this vacancy bid though.

So you just said you didn't get any bonuses, then you say you did.

Going back to the original point - you can't compare 2nd year pay rates, if you suddenly decide "oh but over here you will upgrade after 18 months".
Compare the pay+bonus, or not. Don't move the goal posts to wherever they fit your agenda.
The thing is - there's not much difference in 2nd year pay between PSA and Envoy for FOs. Depending on your date of hire, it's somewhere between a few hundred to a few thousand. But at the same time - you'll likely hold a line at Envoy during that second year, and can pick up a bit of OT, and that levels it off. Goalposts can be moved that way too.
The CA rates are where the big difference is.
As everyone already said - you upgrade so quick anyway that FO rates really shouldn't be that high on the agenda anyway. Get the CA rates up to the pattern and everyone is happy.
Agreed, CA rates need to be addressed badly, there is a disconnect here and fixing it would go a long way to fix a lot of issues we are having at the moment.
Reply