Originally Posted by rickair7777

All things considered, I think they'll need hard forensic evidence. If they have it, probably slam dunk, it's difficult to BS your way around the science in court these days. It's also very hard to NOT leave forensic evidence these days. Immensely difficult between DNA, chemistry, cell phones, computers, etc. They can prove you were, or prove you weren't there. If you go to the trouble and successfully leave no evidence, then you might be in the position of having no proof that you weren't there... when there *should* have been digital evidence of some sort that you were somewhere else. Not only do you have to avoid leaving evidence implicating yourself, you'd probably have to create some fake evidence to support your alibi. Really, really hard unless you're the CIA.