Originally Posted by
NoValueAviator
You are welcome to rebut anything I've ever posted. It shouldn't be hard, I occasionally use hyperbole, and yet you've never done it successfully.
While you're at it explain the methodology you used to study newhires' exposure to APC forums. Probably the same fuzzy math they used to determine a 5.5 yr. or better flow for new hires.
Your post doesn't make any sense.
The 5.5 year flow is horseturd, we all know it.