Originally Posted by
JamesBond
And then again, age 67 could give those that lost their retirement a little more time to make up the difference since many of the younger crowd doesn't give a flying **** about them and aren't willing to do anything to help them out in the upcoming negotiations.
But I agree that it ain't happening anyway so it's moot
Be honest. They didn’t lose their retirement. They lost a varied portion of it from little to a larger amount.
I’ll more than happily fight for retiree medical and increased contributions looking particularly at tax free solutions as that is the right thing to do.
You got a couple years of trash panda time when you couldn’t hold it, too, so the crocodile tears aren’t unnoticed.
(good for you for going for it!)