Originally Posted by
BigZ
1. Used regular google search vs https://scholar.google.com/
2. Used someone's thought (the definition) without proper references
Besides, provided a shallow argument, did not support it with multiple references, did not bother listing and disputing scholarly opinions contrary to own point of view.
Weak.
PS I don't give a damn either way. I'm not getting paid to change people's minds.
Wait a sec... are looking for a peer reviewed, published work on the definition of “anecdotal”?