Originally Posted by
cadetdrivr
UAL's majority ownership of Avianca is a scope violation. And scope is about as serious as it gets.
As a bonus this happened during contract talks that are currently focused on the remaining items of pay, retirement and...scope.
This is gonna get interesting fast.
It could be used as leverage but there is nothing I'm willing to ease scope for. So imho it's a moot point. These are two completely separate issues that should not influence each other.