Thread: DAL Buybacks
View Single Post
Old 06-13-2019, 08:02 AM
  #8  
deltabound
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Default

Originally Posted by mispoken View Post
The reduction in share count and thus higher EPS doesn’t necessarily equate to higher share prices. The cynical side of me believes that since at least some of the executive suites performance/bonuses/compensation is is tied to EPS, they reduce share count and thus EPS to show that they are “performing”.

Another thing to consider is that it’s possible that rather than stock buy backs, they could keep acquiring more 49% stakes than they already are and thus adding further pressure to scope. The other argument is that it should be going toward employee compensation and benefits, but we will certainly have to fight for that.

Nell Minnow has some interesting stuff on corporate governance and her view is that in almost all cases, buybacks are never done to benefit the shareholder and only the executives who benefit most from it. Here is one of her articles.

https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019...sive-buybacks/
Excellent article. Stock buybacks signal a couple of things, almost all of them negative.

If big D truly had confidence in it's gold standard LONG TERM business model, they'd shoot to become an S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrat.

Title given to companies who have increased their dividend return to shareholders annually for a minimum of 25 years.

These are not sexy stocks, but if you're a DRIP investor, they're long term gold.
deltabound is offline