Originally Posted by
poopplop
You must be, because the conclusions you are arriving at using your inference have all been wrong so far. Literally the first sentence in your last post was completely off base, and I explained why.
I explained the back history because in my opinion, you are so far off base. It was an attempt at root cause analysis (which went over your head). Your arguments are just so flatly off to me, and I have no idea as to where you are deriving them (as others have pointed out as well).
So, I’d say best of luck. Carry on. I literally feel that I’m being trolled at this point. So I’m disengaging. If you’re not trolling, well let’s just agree to disagree.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk