I think he's on to something. The hassle and unknown is a deterrent. I also think if we just adhered to the 117 intent as written and extensions were rare for extenuating circumstances, not daily storms in the southeast in the summer, things would be reliable and scientifically safe. Which is completely foreseeable because of the historical data on scheduled release from bid packets vs. actual release. There is a buffer that would allow a statistical reliability at what ever the acceptable level is. We use 99% statistical fuel, don't we?