Originally Posted by
ChecklistMonkey
He'll more than likely get confirmed. The majority in the Senate drools over people who fire whistleblowers without cause. I'm sure most of them would like to see whistleblowers prosecuted for interfering with business interests
So you are saying our "whistleblower" in question is the rational entity here?
One person's "whistleblower" is another's toxic personality/messiah complex sort with an agenda.
Of course the trick is figuring out who really DOES have a legitimate claim, and who doesn't. Kind of like the following I learned in a college class. "I" is the positive connotation of a statement, "you" is the neutral, and "he" is the negative--but they all say the same thing.
I am reconsidering an issue.
You changed your mind.
He went back on his word.
I am a naturalist healer.
You are a medicine man.
He is a witch doctor.