Originally Posted by
Herkflyr
So you are saying our "whistleblower" in question is the rational entity here?
One person's "whistleblower" is another's toxic personality/messiah complex sort with an agenda.
Of course the trick is figuring out who really DOES have a legitimate claim, and who doesn't. Kind of like the following I learned in a college class. "I" is the positive connotation of a statement, "you" is the neutral, and "he" is the negative--but they all say the same thing.
I am reconsidering an issue.
You changed your mind.
He went back on his word.
I am a naturalist healer.
You are a medicine man.
He is a witch doctor.
Not necessarily. I have read a lot of what KP has written and I don't have a lot of positive things to say about her. The optics, however, SHOULD be bad for Dickson because he fired a whistleblower and she got her job back. The current ruling party in the Senate more times than not sides with business so while it should look bad, especially considering the attention it's gotten, I highly doubt it will move the needle on them.