Originally Posted by
TED74
This is very telling about how poor our system is. When you don't sit holidays at 98%, someone at 97% or 90% or 55% has to. If one must scheme the system to overcome the scheming of someone else who is junior, we have a problem (IMHO).
Of course many people for many reasons don't want holiday pay. But I think the majority of our list would enjoy such a policy.
Schemes or scheming implies some nefarious context. Using the PWA to his benefit isn’t a scheme in my book. Just MHO, too.
GP