Originally Posted by
herewego
Now you just need to expand that Revenue per seat mile and equate it to the number of seats, and how far those seats will go in a typical day.
Even though a 777 and an RJ fly at roughly the same speed the 777 pilot moves many more seats over a longer distance in the same time interval that we get paid for. The RJ may get just as much per seat mile, but it is only generating 50-76 seats worth of money to hand to the pilots instead of the 314-396 seats that a 777 moves. Yes we move just as many passengers as the 777 in a day, but with more legs. WHich means more taxi time where seat miles are effectively 0.
A 6 hour payday on a CJR will mean 3-6 legs, which will mean at least 1.5 hours of that 6 hours is taxiing, thus not generating revenue.
Then how much time is spent on those 3-6 legs climbing at a slower speed, descending into the pattern and approach and landing at a slower speed, all while that 777 is cruising along at altitude at .84 for the majority of it's day.
Yes the regional pilots work harder than, in the same environments (or worse) as, into and out of the same airports as the major pilots, but economics just don't support paying the RJ guy the same as the folks flying the bigger metal per hour. Wish it were not true and I'd get a huge raise, but my meager economics understanding wasn't learned from a Berkeley professor so it's just a bit more realistic.
Your entire argument is flawed. RASM doesn't scale based on sector length, hence why Southwest is such a profitable airline. Selling a $250 airfare from Pittsburgh to Chicago (400 miles) doesn't mean a flight from Chicago to Narita costs $4,250. Quite the opposite actually. Shorter segments allow higher utilization dilution amongst revenue units (seats per trip).
A 737 flying 8 sectors a day is spreading its fixed asset costs out over 1,000+ passengers, while a 777 is spreading its (higher) fixed costs amongst 300 passengers, or at the most 600 (two flights).
An RJ operating 6-8 sectors is spreading its fixed costs out over more units than a 777, and the RJ's fixed costs are much less.
You falsely assume long haul flying is the most profitable. It is not at all. Dense, high frequency domestic flying is.