Originally Posted by
Omniscient
Spoken like someone who has 1.5 years into this career....
Not even close to how it works. The NMB does not care HOW you get to an agreement, they are there to facilitate as a mediator to an agreement. They cant dictate "this is the ratio you will use..."
So let me ask..you regional gig, Compass, offers signing bonuses. How much did the pilots have to give back in their contract with concessions to pay for those signing bonuses? Nothing, right? The signing bonuses are a factor of getting butts like yours, in the right seats of those sweet sweet 175s. It wasn't the responsibility of the pilots to negotiate something away, to get those bonuses done. The company had to do it for staffing.
So at Spirit, I wanted the NC to get a livable wage for first year and then a nice bump for second year. Is that what we got, yup. As been said, much higher than the last contract (and the contract before that as well). Guys who want to work here but live in high cost of living states like California, sorry. Thats the choice when you live in a high cost of living state, those views and nice weather days have a cost.
If the NC came in and wanted more for 1st year, more than what they got, they would have taken it from another area, this is clear as clear can be and has been explained over and over again by the MEC. When the NC wanted to close the industry leading pay slope in longevity, they got some, but not all. It all has a cost.
So when it comes down to it, I would rather see the extra money go to say 5th year CA pay vs 1st year FO pay. I would rather see it go to 2nd year FO pay, 3rd year FO pay etc....guys with skin in the game and are here to make it a career and not a place holder while their A320 type rating ink is drying on their resume for Delta.
If you are someone who can only focus on 1st year pay for a career job, then what can I say, I dont trust your decision making at that point and rather not have you aboard anyways. Tough talk, yup, but it's true.
If the company needs to fill FO classes and the hourly rate isnt cutting it, they need to get a signing bonus or better yet offer a MOU to the union to raise pay. We still have some big holes to fix in the contract and increasing FO pay to $90/hr, so Spirit can staff that next order, isnt priority one as far as im concerned.
For those who think we wont hire "safe" pilots at our current rate...all speculation and assumptions. Airlines all around pay a lot less than we do and still manage to not ball up planes into mountains. So where as its a nice talking point, there is nothing to show that a pilot making $60k a year for their first year is going to be a safety issue, just as a $38hr pilot 3 years ago wasn't crashing planes. Just as you, a Compass pilot who makes regional FO wages, hasn't crashed yet.
A rational defense of low first year pay. While I may not agree with it - in fact I don’t since to me it sort of still boils down to a defense of avarice by the senior people that can only undermine pilot group unity - I can at least admire someone willing to toss his opinion out for public consumption rather than hide behind Sophist diversions and ad hominem attacks.
I would say the “a living wage” issue is subject to interpretation. Is $15 an hour a “living wage”?
Assuming what you desire in a new hire is someone with meaningful regional experience, one must ask what $57 an hour buys, especially after a couple of months of that first year being training pay which will reduce the overall pay for the first year considerably. It will make the pay less than most first year regional FOs get (counting their signing bonuses and training pay) and less than most second year FO’s get and for damn sure less than the average regional captain gets.
So yeah, if that’s what your MEC is shooting for, telling new hires your pilot group values them less than regional management values their new hires, you will be successful. Will you still get people? Oh h€|| yeah, Atlas is still getting newbies to sit in the right seat of a 747 for $40k first year. Are those the people you really want? Time will tell I guess.
As for what arbitrators will and will not order, I’d suggest you talk to some of the older Alaska pilots about the Kasher ruling.
But you at least had the cojones to state your case, not bluster, demean (very much anyway

) or evade. Though our opinions differ I respect you for that.