Originally Posted by
zippinbye
Trip, there is nothing trivial about this violation. I’d much rather fly HNL-NRT than LAX-MCO. I’m about 8 years short on seniority to get across the Pacific it seems, so it does directly impact me. Not saying I’m entitled to fly that route, but I’d like to, and I’d have better odds of doing so if the production balance were fair, rigid and and adhered to. It’s simply outrageous to suggest we should consider the violations are petty and let it slide. Scope matters. Every little piece matters!
Concur with the above. Explain to us Trip how 2500 trivial hours of trans-pacific flying has no effect on jobs? If we can’t defend this, what can we defend? You accuse the union of being one-sided in their communications and I don’t disagree, but your post to start this thread is far more one-sided than the union comms.