View Single Post
Old 09-09-2019 | 11:56 AM
  #73  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 691
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Right, but I was referencing a tiered approach and not RJ's anyway. It was (I think) Gulfstreams/Globals or something like that at DPJ that violated our scope at the time. I agree those should have been brought in house, however the absolute least they could have done was secure flow down jobs for that number of positions. They did neither and instead forgave it and enshrined the company's ability to do it with non union, off list pilots permanently. That wasn't a scope recapture issue; we already at the time owned that scope. It was denied, slow walked and eventually given away for nothing.
I agree with the sentiment. My only point was that we are in the giving business, I want to be in the taking (back) business. But I'd settle for no business transactions in SCOPE. Baby steps is what we need apparently.
Reply