View Single Post
Old 09-26-2019 | 06:30 AM
  #85  
crewdawg's Avatar
crewdawg
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 413
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757
And to the poster who said they’d rather ten flights to AMS than serving 8 other cities, if you’re saying 10>8 so it’s better, I’ll buy that. But when you find yourself laying over in Paris, 3-4 times a week, every week, and enduring that long @$$ bus ride every morning on arrival, you’ve officially taken all the fun out of international flying.
The real fun of international flying is NOT going to work.

Originally Posted by Big E 757
AMS is much better than CDG or LHR in my opinion, and if that’s how Delta can make the most money, I’m not complaining, but the variety of destinations made International flying a lot of fun not too long ago. If we can hold on to some of the variety, while focusing on our JV partner hubs, I’d be ok with that.

But seriously, agreed on all parts. I'd love some more variety, even just what we had a few years ago would be better than now. I specifically avoid CDG due to the bus ride and I've really got nothing for Paris anymore. AMS is a great airport, city and layover...if I were stuck with just one of our current layovers, it would be there. Here's hoping for profitable expansion into more locations.
Reply