View Single Post
Old 10-01-2019 | 05:49 AM
  #29  
Chato
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Smackover
This is right. They determined they could pay actual retroactive pay but they were wrong. That triggers the “otherwise” language in the LOA - 20 hours per month from June 1 to implementation of the new rates.
Am i understanding this right. They owe August hours plus july premium + 20 hour penalty as of October for not paying on time.
If that’s the case, the company should have went with the 20hrs/month from the start, they would be easily up to date and no penalty would apply.
Reply