Originally Posted by
Baradium
Where did you see this? All I saw was that the dispatch reliability is lower than we like to see from our aircraft but as expected for this stage of its introduction. Also that we want to improve it but that doesn't mean it's underperforming. Is this not from a regular company communication?
I'd be curious as well. No one ever likes to lose face. Whenever someone claims to "know" something they'll never admit they're wrong--ever. Sometimes it is an individual posting on social media or message boards. Sometimes it is the company. So who is ultimately right or wrong? Usually we don't know until years later.
Take the 350. Reading these message boards, it is underperforming, the company wishes they'd never bought it, etc. And yet, every time that question is asked of "top men" it is wonderful, everything we ever hoped, will be our flagship for decades, etc. Who is right?