Originally Posted by
pitchattitude
Haven’t read or heard the minutes, but he won’t be 23 until next February. There is a reason the FARs are in place.
My suspicion is that the FAR is in place to address maturity. Whether the finer points of this drama are true or not, it seems to me that the Rep has acted immaturely. I’m not sure I would like someone to represent me that can’t disagree in a mature fashion and has by his own admission requested an exception to a rule for himself only. At a minimum I say that is just poor taste and depending on what the minutes say it may approach completely unethical. Either way should be removed. Should be above reproach when it comes to to this office.