Originally Posted by
hydrostream
Obviously getting a shaker is no bueno, but getting to a true stall would mean ignoring the shaker. So if we're getting that many actual stalls that would be insane.
Ok I think you are missing the forest through the trees here.
Human pilots are putting airplanes in the position of either imminent stall or full on stall.
Therefore, systems like Airbus's software logic or Boeing's MCAS were developed.
Same goes for GPWS and CFIT.
The list goes on. Human factors are the source of the vast majority of crashes. The argument can be made that further increasing automation will actually make aviation even safer. And just because people haven't died in a decade doesn't mean unsafe events have not happened, ie the EET we are doing now.