Originally Posted by
Bluewaffle
Operate our 787s? No, I never Said that. With a JV, they wouldn’t have to. The majority of future flying would just go to the carrier that United has a minority stake in. This is about protecting future flying. There’s nothing in the section you just referenced that prevents that in its entirety.
You didn't say it but that's EXACTLY what P2P reps are telling people. Did you read the scope section? How exactly do you see a "majority" of flying going anywhere?
I seriously hope I am wrong as hell but, my opinion only, there are way too many signs pointing to caving on more RJ's. I will be happy to eat my words but I don't think that's going to happen. We'll see soon enough.
By the way, it's your contention that United can buy a minority stake in Avianca and then let them fly unlimited flights for United? If that's incorrect, how about an example of what you think could happen.