View Single Post
Old 10-28-2019 | 07:10 AM
  #34  
Learjet driver
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: 30 West
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
M&A have 2 elements. Category/Class and Relative seniority. With a UA merger, or with any of the big 3 for that matter, there would be a fencing off of aircraft based on career expectations (Widebodies), then there would be an argument about the larger narrow body aircraft (75s). Besides the cat/class, you're looking at relative seniority and the only real arguing point there is how much of a longevity multiplier to you give the legacy airline pilots based on YOS. Once that's decided, you plug and play. This is over simlified but that's the 30K' view.

Again, I think a merger with JB and a Big 3 would still work out for the JB guys better. Especially the younger JB pilots. I still don't like the thoughts of a SW merger just because of the unknown and how they took in AT. I don't really care what condition of AT was in at the time of the merger. It might work out, but I wouldn't want the unknown factor they present.
Your merger with Southwest might be based on that but ALPA merger policy is based on 3 things.... Status (Capt or FO), Category and Class (777 vs. A320) and Longevity (1995 vs. 2015).

It never mentions relative seniority. In a merger of equals relative seniority usually plays out because of all three of those conditions.

United, American or Delta are not equal to JetBlue. Southwest on the other hand is.
Reply