Thread: Vacancy 20-03V
View Single Post
Old 10-29-2019 | 09:25 AM
  #167  
Vernon Demerest
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 342
Likes: 18
From: B777 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Broncofan
I completely agree. Seniority at the indoc should not be age based but random. Its age discrimination. Just because you are younger you are now forced into a seat that you might not want, making less money because it's going to take longer to be a line holder, worse schedules and most likely committing. United I'm sure at some point will have a law suit.
A lawsuit in which they will win. Seniority has to start somewhere and as the youngest in my class over a decade ago, I get it. Short term pain. My class already has its oldest retiring within 2 years while I and others have over 20 years to go, the last decade of which (if we stay healthy) will have us under 10% seniority systemwide and retiring sub 100. Why is it not fair to give those who made the move later in life a temporary leg up?