Originally Posted by
BoilerUP
If I'm honest?
Probably because I'm expecting the churn will generate considerable movement across fleets in SDF, and lack the perspective of an ANC 747 pilot concerned about possible downside impacts to ANC trip and line construction.
The thought that they have to keep SDF 747 bid small because of the “associated churn” is a fallacy. Article 14E-e1 a-c addresses this. Each and every system/realignment bid since I have been here have been affected by this. I myself have been personally affected twice. I think that many people here and on the line use here say as gospel. The fact is, every vacancy bid created the exact same amount of “churn”. The only thing different on this is the paid move portion which is, in reality, negligible.