Originally Posted by
Busboy
What makes anyone think we'd have different leadership, if we changed the name of our union?
The best armed military is no good, if the leaders aren't capable. Nor, is that military effective, if the soldiers won't fight.
Do you think that army would be more effective, with less weapons...But, a different name?
OK, sign me up for change...I don't care what we call it; I just want fair representation; a Union that represents the majority, not a select minority.
As far as your military analogy goes, I think it's safe to say that our MEC would have been relieved of command long ago...one of the first rules that you learn as a "butter bar" is to take care of your troops. They have failed miserably. I'm ready to fight. SG