Originally Posted by
TOGALOCK
Have YOU ever heard of the Air Commerce Act and the Necessary and Proper Clause? Might want to give McCulloch vs. Maryland a read which gives the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the clause.
I don't think you have read McCulloch v Maryland. I have no problem with the holding (other than the fact that it supported the central bank at the time... a central bank is unconstitutional)
Originally Posted by
TOGALOCK
Further there is case law of which the name deceives me at the moment (United States vs. Cosby, maybe?), that establishes that land owners do not own the airspace above their property “to the heavens” (making it Federal airspace to be overseen by a federal regulatory body). To be fair, the case law further stated that the government could not seize to ground level without compensation.
I disagree with that, and I also disagree with the idea that you don't own the dirt beneath your property either. Both are absurd and an abomination to property rights.