Old 12-16-2019 | 12:06 PM
  #174  
ItnStln's Avatar
ItnStln
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Longhornmaniac8
That's false.

Go read any number of the papers. Oreskes 2004, Doran and Zimmerman 2009, Anderegg et al. 2010, Cook 2014. They all reached the same conclusion using slightly different methodologies. It's all peer-reviewed, transparent and falsifiable, the way science should be. And in stark contrast to the skeptic blogosphere.

And you want climate scientists talking about climate change, not just any scientist. That's how you wind up with the Oregon petition that was a laughing stock.
I meant to type climate scientist but apparently overlooked that.
Reply