Old 12-22-2019, 07:22 AM
  #34  
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,405
Default

Originally Posted by No Land 3 View Post
Too bad considering that the 757 was the original Max. Throw on more efficient wings and engines. Lost opportunity, instead they went with a design that is as old as a 727.
They went with the max to save $15-20B on clean-sheet R&D. They would have gotten away with their Rube Goldberg update too, if they had managed it a little better.... look at their pre-crash order book. I hope the max 10 main gear has better engineering and oversight than mcas.

Their motive for saving the R&D was either short-term greed, or longer-term planning for the looming need to incorporate revolutionary new technology into future airliners to save fuel (and thereby carbon). The tech wasn't ready yet, probably need another ten years.
rickair7777 is offline