Originally Posted by
WiscoAviator
Enough to simultaneously make the program seem legitimate while also maintaining staffing at the UAX regionals. My airline I believe trains about 10 new CAs per month and we are understaffed. I wouldn't expect more than 2 or 3 per month but that's just totally a guess.
Also, IMO the only thing they have to do to keep the program legitimate is to make the time of service for those being taken similar to the AA flows. So I would expect them to meter it so that the people being taken are around 5-6 years at the company.... again im just guessing
The AA flows are superior to Aviate because they are guarantees. If you could go to an AA wholly owned with a guarantee of flowing in 5-10 years, or go to a UAX carrier with only a chance of being selected into Aviate and then flowing in 5-10 years, who would you choose?
If they don’t get their timeline significantly shorter than an AA flow no one will think they’re legitimate