Originally Posted by pitchattitude

If there were 540 total attrition in the year, shouldn’t a new hire moved up that much? The hypothetical “Charlie Bucket” new guy should have moved up the most as all attrition should have been ahead of him unless there was a unusual amount of people that didn’t make through the first year immediately after he was hired?

Someone two to four years in would have moved up much less as there would be more attrition below as that’s where the highest attrition is.

Just trying to get a better picture of what is going on.