View Single Post
Old 01-13-2020, 06:56 PM
  #1  
DirtyPurple
Not a real airline pilot
 
DirtyPurple's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: Cargo > Pax
Posts: 365
Default Change My View - Part 117

I see the posting on PFC. I admit I do not fully understand every aspect of Part 117.

Talking to my pax-carrier buddies, particularly those who fly long haul, it seems like it did unnecessarily complicate their trips, and in many cases extended their trip footprints to comply with the Part 117 crew rest requirements.

From my limited perspective, I don’t think we want Part 117 in cargo. Am I missing something? Wouldn’t it potentially wreck a commuter’s flexibility?

I’m all ears.
DirtyPurple is offline