View Single Post
Old 01-25-2020 | 10:25 AM
  #45  
captkdobbs's Avatar
captkdobbs
Back on Reserve
Veteran: Army
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 841
Likes: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
The following is my opinion. From what information I can gather the "optional" choice is very complicated and there is a process that has to be adhered to. My understanding is Dalpa can say it will be optional because, at this point, it hasn't been determined yet that it can't be optional.

The first step is that something has to be negotiated with regards to the proposal. Lets just assume the proposal is negotiated as is. Once this is done then both Delta and Dalpa submit this Plan to the IRS and tell the IRS what they intend to do. It is then up to the IRS to approve or reject all or part of the Plan.
Since an MBCBP is legal in and of itself, the only thing that is possibly in question would be the "optional" nature of the the Plan.

The above brings me to a question. Why would the IRS not agree to the Plan being optional? If they don't and it applies to everyone then that will lead to more money that is tax deferred (not a good thing in the IRS's eyes) than if the Plan were optional where the IRS could collect more taxes now and on future investments of that money.

Standing by for incoming!!!

Denny
No 'incoming' from me. This is very logical.

The other thing about negotiating a completely new program is that an 'Out clause' could be included. i.e. "The MBCBP shall be approved by the IRS as 'Optional', otherwise the MBCBP shall not be implemented and the current DPSP Cash language from the previous PWA shall remain unchanged and in force."

(or some similar language that the lawyers would write)
Reply