Old 01-10-2008, 06:35 PM
  #1  
ToiletDuck
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default The Boyd Group: 2008 airline industry overview

http://www.aviationplanning.com/Predictions2008.htm

Sector One: Small Lift Providers

Say Good-Bye To A Lot of Regional Jets, Real Soon.
Fuel Pass-Throughs Will Pass Them Directly To The Desert

It should be back-to-the-drawing-board time for small lift providers, what some still call "regional airlines." Maybe time for a period of sheer panic, too. The issue: 50-seat and smaller RJs are being economically marginalized by skyrocketing fuel costs.

Major carriers will be looking to quickly cull out dozens of RJs in the coming months. And hundreds more in the next five years, with no replacement for this lift - or many of the markets they operate - in sight.

Most SLP agreements provide for fuel costs to be a pure pass-through to the major carrier, and that means the majors are eating a lot of red ink. A lot of RJ mission applications that once provided adequate revenue generation are now net drains on major airline systems. They cannot but move quickly to restructure (read: reduce) the fleets of RJs they're leasing in.

Faster Retirements Than Predicted. The Boyd Group's Global Fleet Demand Forecasts were the first to predict the decline in demand for new RJs, and also to predict that the number in operation represented a glut. That was as far back as 1999, when otherrjbye2.JPG (8290 bytes) consultants were still forecasting just the opposite from the comfort of their rearview mirrors, and the warmth of being within "the consensus.".

As attendees at our Annual Aviation Forecast Conference last October learned, retirements of CRJs and ERJs would result in global RJ fleets declining by over 1,200 units over the next ten years.

Now, with oil hovering at $100 a barrel, that forecast has been revised. The retirement projections are for over 1,700 RJs to come out of fleets for the same ten year period, with the rate front-loaded in the 2008 - 2013 period, representing approximately 835 RJs taken out of service in the US alone.

The net-new figure represents larger CRJs (mostly -900s) coming into SLP fleets to replace 50-seat -200s. But even here, there isn't a whole lot of demand going forward. There are no new-generation <70 seaters on the horizon to replace the current fleet of 50-seat and smaller RJs. That means new fleet mixes.

It also means fundamentally-revised airline route systems.

Note: The Boyd Group categorizes "regional jets" as CRJ and ERJ airliners, based on cabin ergonomics. It is inaccurate to define "regional jets" by seat capacity, otherwise airliners such as the F-100, the DC-9, the F-28, and even the 737-200/500 could be defined as "regional jets." Therefore, the Embraer E-Jet platform, which represents per-passenger cabin dimensions that are equal to and even better than 737s, is not considered a "regional jet" aircraft. That's because the market niche that aircraft was designed for was to fill the mainline airliner gap left open by Boeing and Airbus.

Late Night Oil Burning In The Planning Department. As we speak, planning departments at comprehensive network carriers are in full metal jacket status, working to moderate the level of financial drain smaller RJs are inflicting on their systems.

Legal departments are working, too, reviewing current service agreements with SLPs. Most contracts are relatively long-term - to 2013 or beyond. The problem is that there is no way that the current number of these RJs can be supported until then with jet-A heading to $3 a gallon and up. Culling the herd in is the cards.

Many agreements contain an early-out provision for the CNC, where a six-month notice can be given. In most cases, however, these notice dates don't become effective until late 2008 or 2009, and majors cannot afford to wait that long to cut RJ lift. So that means doing some deals with current SLPs. A cash payment in exchange for an early-out. Renegotiating the agreement with a financial incentive for the SLP to shift to larger CRJs or even into E-Jets, depending on the status of scope clauses at the CNC.

Wholly-Owned SLPs Could Be Going Away? Maybe - just maybe - if the financial hit becomes too onerous, some wholly-owned SLP subsidiaries could be shuttered. This is not a drill - we are talking financial bleeding here. With fuel costs going up, the economy (maybe) softening, and the specter of labor needing and demanding increases, such an action is not out of the question.

Small Lift Providers To Watch. Clearly, 50-seaters are in the economic cross-hairs. And any jet airliner smaller than that is just marking time 'til the grim-reaper comes to take it to the Budweiser plant. So the question arises regarding how the SLP sector will survive.

The hard reality is that the SLP sector will be shrinking markedly over the next three years. Hard fact: there are more 50-seat jets than can be economically flown. Hard fact: that means cutbacks in the number of operators.

SLPs must move to hasten their fleet migration into larger CRJs or, better, into the Embraer E-Jet platform. But that means bigger units of capacity, higher sector costs, and, ergo, fewer markets where such aircraft can operate compared to what 50-seaters could do before the price of jet-A headed toward the Moon.

The first option - larger CRJs - will provide better per-seat economics for the CNC customer, and for CRJ-200 operators, a relatively painless shift. But it's still an RJ, and with more seats and higher sector costs, it won't do much for the communities that are in line to see loss of service as the 50-seat cost bar goes up and CNCs cut flights.

A Potential Winner In The Wings. The SLP to watch is Republic. It has dumped its 37-seat ERJs, and has adjusted its fleet to the point where over half of its inventory is now out of RJs and into E-Jets. And, regardless of the trendy babble to the contrary, small mainline airliners such as these are the ones that have the long-term future, not RJs. Republic also has a wide stable of CNC customers, giving it enormous depth of revenue flows - not to mention some insulation from doom if the dragons of Wall Street drag a couple of CNCs into the merger pit. Without question, Republic is the best postured SLP to not only survive the upcoming RJ-Fleet-Valentine's Day Massacre, but to actually prosper.

Bombardier In The Catbird Seat? The need to chop 50-seaters out of fleets is likely one that CNCs are going to pursue with some urgency. But the current agreements likely don't consider Hugo Chavez, OPEC, and speculators running up the price of go-juice, as an Act of God that will allow modification of SLP contracts. But there could be the potential of CNCs assisting some of their CRJ-operator partners in acquiring larger CRJs, which would be a short-term bonanza for Bombardier.

Countering this are union scope clauses. In the current labor environment, it's not likely that pilot unions are going to relax anything, including restrictions on operations of more 70 to 100 seat jets outside of the mainline contract. While it's near-certain that Bombardier will see some additional -900 orders, a review of the market indicates that it will be in the neighborhood of maybe another 250 units. Even with this, the US skies will see over 500 fewer RJs in 2013.

Effect on Air Service. CNCs will be doing some serious triage on their RJ operations. The objective will be to maximize revenue. Any market that was on the margin in the past is likely not going to be there on the next schedule change, or by the end of 2008. Here's a general template for RJ markets that may be victims of the reduction in 50-seat fleets.

*

RJ markets whose traffic flows involve high amounts of low-yield (read: Florida) connecting traffic, are prime candidates for the chopping block.
*

Any RJ market over 1,000 SM that has load factors under 70%, and/or has high concentrations of low-fare traffic.
*

RJ markets that are inflicted with chronic ATC delays. That means service to/from some NYC area airports. To a lesser degree, ORD, SFO, and LAX. Remember, the SLPs are paid largely on a cost-plus basis, and 30-minute to 45-minute out-to-off times burn a lot of fuel the CNC gets billed for.
*

Use of RJs for fill-in frequencies in high-density markets may also be given a jaundiced eye.
*

Another target for cuts: RJs used by CNCs for competitive-harassment hub missions, i.e., flown head to head against larger jets operated by competitors, intending to bleed some traffic away and possibly put the competitor's flights below the profit line. A strategy that may have made sense with $50 oil. Less so with $100 oil.

As for new market entry using RJs - it's still possible, particularly if the new traffic flows represent better revenue streams than existing markets. In particular, the emerging industrial centers in the Deep South are prime candidates.

But for those communities where traffic is already weak, or have no service now, the price of RJ entry is now a whole lot higher.

__________
ToiletDuck is offline