View Single Post
Old 04-07-2020 | 08:39 AM
  #62  
ERflyer
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
There's going to be displacements no matter what we do. Likewise for furloughs to some degree and duration. What lowering ALV will do is reduce how far the negatives go. While you don't want a "double whammy" of an hours cut along with a displacement, lower ALV's will reduce how far you slide down the ladder. For some that will not prevent a displacement but for others it will. For those who still get displaced, it will at least reduce the seniority slide.

Full ALV til the last day is a very poor and hyper fatalistic strategy that only makes sense in two scenarios; imminent liquidation or rapid V shaped recovery. For everything in the middle, which is far more likely, lower ALV/GAR (especially in conjunction with early outs and even lower SIL's) won't eliminate, but will significantly mitigate, whatever downside there will be. The traditional mass furlough to the bone model will also slow our recovery on the upside of this, meaning whatever furloughs and displacements we see will last longer than they would have with a reduced ALV.
Did we agree to lower ALV’s by 20% to avoid furloughs previously? Is this being done by other airlines? Why is this being promoted by the company before any attempt to use SILs and early retirements? I believe it is an attempt to divide us. It also an attempt to play to the emotions of other employee groups.
Reply