This thread would be hilarious if it wasn't for the fact that
your (as in the collective) opinion does have an affect (on current and future) FDX ALPA leadership. Even more ominously, it is surely read (and no doubt, laughed at) by the very people we have to negotiate against.
Our problem is not lack of (leadership) interest in improving our work conditions and pay; DW and all on the MEC stand to benefit, as do you, by better pay and improved sch/scope/etc. The problem isn't even lack of (proven) resolve by the membership. The
problem is the inability to even get to a position to squeeze the company and make them see the benefit of agreeing to our terms. We might fail collectively to "pull the trigger" in a self help situation but unless the NMB will let us out of mediation, we are forced to sit and plead with the company to offer us better terms. ALPA is not the problem in negotiating nor was BC, the problem was political leadership in Washington that is unabashedly anti labor. We could have held out for more, and in all likelihood, would still be waiting for (any) improvements, or a pay raise, since the first contract.
If you think ALPA is the root of all our problems, go on ahead and delude yourself. Age 65, our contract, even our hated LOA, are all the result of the (national) political power we don't have and management does. Keep that in mind as you consider your vote 10 months from now.
