Originally Posted by paidtowait

Well I don't post here much any more but I could not let this slide by uncorrected.

The privileges of an A&P with an inspection authorization are limited to approval for return to service after Major Repairs and Alterations (FAA Form 337) and annual inspections required on aircraft less than 12500lbs MGTOW
And there are some geared reciprocating engines that require an IA (i.e. Form 337 major repair)

The approval for return to service privileges granted to a certificated A&P are far reaching.
Essentially without quoting the rule, an A&P technician can approve an aircraft for return to service after performing maintenance provided he/she has the appropriate training or experience with regard to the work performed.
So if you have been to maintenance school on Learjets guess what… or if you have been supervised on a similar task on a similar aircraft (Change Starter Generator on a turbine engine), guess what … the rule says you are qualified.

Now to speak to the original question, most of the previous posters have said that, yes it helps, however I would say be careful how you present yourself in an interview for a job.

In my present position my maintenance input is advisory only and I made it very clear at the interview. I have been on both sides of the fence for over 25 years and yes, today I command a six figure income on a mid sized jet, in a 2 man flight dept. because I have the ability to save the CO. time and money when it really counts.