Thread: Stanford Study
View Single Post
Old 04-21-2020 | 10:22 AM
  #35  
gloopy
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
My reading comprehension is just fine! I Went to state college which is like going through high school twice but I do know that personal choice is a virtue, an important one indeed. Science not prayers is what will get us through this. Scientific data (peer reviewed, listening to smarter people) Not fixed news our you fav pundit from either side of the Aisle. If POTUS would have acted responsibly and got ahead of it we would be having different conversation. Bleeding heart Gloopy??? if scientific fact based approach is wrong and a political or religious approach is correct then have at it. Please Just refuse scientific medical therapy if anyone unfortunately gets sick and touches your life. It is the right thing to do if you choose to follow ideological ideals and people that are winging it. But bottom line guys, I am glad we can disagree and rib at each other because it is public discourse and it is freedom. I wish you guys all well.
Yes POTUS should have enacted flight and travel bans much sooner and to a much greater extent, just like all the leftists were clamoring for way back in January. Rumor has it that's why Pelosi ripped up the speech, because he was too liberal with his open borders mentality. Also he should have nationalized the means of production and ordered millions of additional ventilators and built millions more field hospital beds. Or something.

The implication that you have the compassion monopoly because you care about lives is extremely disingenuous. People who believe we shut down too much and for too long also care about lives just as much as you do.

You want to give up some liberty to get some safety. I get it, its the oldest political dichotomy under the sun. But crashing the world economy (many elements of this will get worse before they get better) under the gushing emotional nonsense of "if it saves just one life!" is pure insanity. Not to mention anti "science" because massive ecoomic collapses kill people too. This whole thing was supposedly to "flatten the curve" which was understandable to a degree. Now its stay locked down in a self induced great depression otherwise you don't care about people dying and it could be someone you know! Please.

That is so stupid its hard to believe its even being considered much less implemented. You win this policy round though. You're getting what you advocate for, although you will be awarded zero points for your retroactive policy recommendations for your TDS indulgeance. Nice try though. Let them eat ice cream. Lots and lots of people are going to die from the follow on effects of a depression economy that will ruin lives and businesses for many years to come from this and there will be a significant rise in self harm, drug addiction, crime, homelessness etc and that's just in the USA where we will fare better (or less bad) in those effects than many other places around the world. And that's even assuming it doesn't lead to wars which it all too often does.

But that'll be worth it too, if it saves just one life, because that could be someone you know! Any disagreement means you are heartless and only want to sacrifice people at the altar of the stock market blah blah blah capitalism is bad real socialism has never been tried etc.

I agree with you about the sancity of free speech and expression. Sadly that is under assault and we haven't seen the end of the beginning on that front yet. The right barely cares about it and the left has completely replaced it with SJW cancel culture nonsense. But maybe if we get rid of it altogether we can save just one more life. If so it will be worth it.
Reply