Originally Posted by gloopy

That's an odd statement since I not only acknowledged the other side of it, but was specifically retorting an opposing "one sided" argument.

Shutting things down, to a point, will save some lives. Keeping things shut down will cost lives (as in deaths) as well as ruin many others. Its very disingenuous to claim a compassion monopoly and therefore a moral and policy superiority while painting those who disagree as heartless evil stock market robber barons.

We cannot stay shut down much longer. The damage from what we've already done is going to be very severe. Let's not make it absolutely catastrophic.