Originally Posted by
Karnak
I say this As a neither pro nor anti vaxxer (which would be binary thinking) and I’m trying to say this as respectfully as possible:
Point 1: When the article’s support to discredit Dr Neunenschwander includes and I quote
1. the word “
quacks”
2. that the Dr. has “many strange beliefs”
3. He “ runs a for-profit company”. Oh no! Not profit! Pharmaceutical companies don’t make profit! Oh wait..
4. He “advertises disproven and unproven treatments, like homeopathy, pricey intravenous treatments, and much-criticized CEASE therapy.” Many people seek alternative medicine, he provides it. Chiropractic, Accupuncture, have long be criticized similarly. For some people that works and it’s a treatment an individual should have the right to choose.
That is amateur writing and pretty much a hit piece.
Point 2:
I dated a girl whose dad was a cardio vascular surgeon. Do you know how many times he got sued? A lot! Medical malpractice cases are very common. Just stating that a doctor has something on their record is really weak support.
point 3:
Look into Dr. Gary Fettke of Australia. I’m not gonna link, just search and YouTube him. See him speak in his own words. He contradicted the Australian government dietary recommendations and spoke out against sugar.
I‘m sick and tired of researching medical information and people to turn around and say just believe everything mainstream medicine says or you’re a _______. There is a TON of information out there.
point 4:
So what if Dr. Exely is funded by anti vaxxers? He studies aluminum affects in the brain, and Im glad someone does.
Should pro vaxx doctors be subject to the same scrutiny for accepting money from pro vaxx pharm? That would at least be consistent logic. And who has deeper pockets, the Phama industry of a bunch of ****ed off moms?