Originally Posted by
OVC010CB
To me it seems very self-absorbed to knowingly live an unhealthy lifestyle and then demand society destroy itself to avoid the consequences of previous decisions.
I think there is a middle way that can be followed, locking up healthy people and children isn’t part of that.
I agree. No one wants society to destroy itself and there needs to be an endgame. But where we differ is how to resolve the next 6-12 months.
I look at the plan that's laid out in front of us and think that it's not enough. And that opening up will be
more damaging than continued lockdown and preparation. You see the existing lockdown and the damage that it's causing and want it to resolve, optimistic that things will improve going forward.
It's that 6 month vision is where we differ.